The BCSE's "Research"
The BCSE communicates its message to the world through its website. This website has a few dozen articles, almost all written by the BCSE's de facto leader, Roger Stanyard.
When I launched my blog, "BCSE Revealed", I decided not to trawl through these articles one by one, to refute their many bizarre and false claims. This would involve dragging many reputations unnecessarily through the mud by repeating the outright slanders that the BCSE have in case after case manufactured. Instead, I decided to focus on just a few, where I could give comprehensive demonstrations of how the BCSE does its "research", and what the quality of that research is. By choosing articles that dealt with issues rather than persons (of which there aren't many!), I could show how utterly untrustworthy the BCSE are - and hence, show why anyone giving any credence to their other articles must be extremely credulous.
An essential component of real science is the proper, impartial and unbiased processing of raw data gathered from the proper sources. In case after case, what I demonstrated was that the BCSE had very little idea about this kind of thing. Instead, their method was to pre-determine their conclusion (that anyone questioning Darwinism must be mad, bad, or preferably both), and then go hunting for any tit-bit that might support this case. Any evidence to the contrary gets screened out at an early stage; anything supporting this idea is accepted as almost certainly true, no matter where the suggestion came from or what evidence was offered in its favour.
Here are the articles: